成人免费xx,国产又黄又湿又刺激不卡网站,成人性视频app菠萝网站,色天天天天

Home Cart Sign in  
Chemical Structure| 764-89-6 Chemical Structure| 764-89-6
Chemical Structure| 764-89-6

*Storage: {[sel_prStorage]}

*Shipping: {[sel_prShipping]}

{[proInfo.proName]}

CAS No.: 764-89-6

,{[proInfo.pro_purity]}

4.5 *For Research Use Only !

{[proInfo.pro_purity]}
Cat. No.: {[proInfo.prAm]} Purity: {[proInfo.pro_purity]}

Change View

Size Price VIP Price

US Stock

Global Stock

In Stock
{[ item.pr_size ]} Inquiry {[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,item.pr_rate,item.mem_rate,item.pr_is_large_size_no_price, item.vip_usd) ]}

US Stock: ship in 0-1 business day
Global Stock: ship in 2 weeks

  • {[ item.pr_size ]}

In Stock

- +

Please Login or Create an Account to: See VIP prices and availability

US Stock: ship in 0-1 business day
Global Stock: ship in 2 weeks

  • 1-2 Day Shipping
  • High Quality
  • Technical Support Online Technical Q&A
Product Citations

Product Citations

Zhichao Li ; Ciril S. Prasad ; Xielin Wang ; Ding Zhang ; Gururaj V. Naik ;

Abstract: Exceptional point (EP)-based optical sensors exhibit exceptional sensitivity but poor detectivity due to their acute sensitivity to perturbations such as noise. When the optical budget is limited as in applications on mobile platforms, high detectivity might be equally important as high sensitivity. In such scenarios, off-EP sensing is advantageous where a slight loss in sensitivity can lead to a significant gain in detectivity. Here, we show that a passive parity-time symmetric plasmonic-photonic hybrid shows a peak in its detectivity off EP where the sensitivity is still very high-surpassing the sensitivities of equivalent fully-plasmonic and fully-photonic systems. We demonstrate the high detectivity of off-EP sensing of anti-mouse IgG protein using this plasmonic-photonic hybrid system. We report a sensitivity of 1.2 nm/nM while requiring a minimum optical budget of 1.3 nJ. Thus, non-Hermitian plasmonic-photonic hybrids could be the best class of nanophotonic sensors for real-world applications.

Purchased from AmBeed:

Alternative Products

Product Details of [ 764-89-6 ]

CAS No. :764-89-6
Formula : C8H16O3
M.W : 160.21
SMILES Code : O=C(O)CCCCCCCO
MDL No. :MFCD00792446
InChI Key :KDMSVYIHKLZKET-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Pubchem ID :69820

Safety of [ 764-89-6 ]

GHS Pictogram:
Signal Word:Warning
Hazard Statements:H315-H319
Precautionary Statements:P264-P280-P302+P352-P337+P313-P305+P351+P338-P362+P364-P332+P313

Calculated chemistry of [ 764-89-6 ] Show Less

Physicochemical Properties

Num. heavy atoms 11
Num. arom. heavy atoms 0
Fraction Csp3 0.88
Num. rotatable bonds 7
Num. H-bond acceptors 3.0
Num. H-bond donors 2.0
Molar Refractivity 43.5
TPSA ?

Topological Polar Surface Area: Calculated from
Ertl P. et al. 2000 J. Med. Chem.

57.53 ?2

Lipophilicity

Log Po/w (iLOGP)?

iLOGP: in-house physics-based method implemented from
Daina A et al. 2014 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

1.63
Log Po/w (XLOGP3)?

XLOGP3: Atomistic and knowledge-based method calculated by
XLOGP program, version 3.2.2, courtesy of CCBG, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry

-0.11
Log Po/w (WLOGP)?

WLOGP: Atomistic method implemented from
Wildman SA and Crippen GM. 1999 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

1.4
Log Po/w (MLOGP)?

MLOGP: Topological method implemented from
Moriguchi I. et al. 1992 Chem. Pharm. Bull.
Moriguchi I. et al. 1994 Chem. Pharm. Bull.
Lipinski PA. et al. 2001 Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev.

1.08
Log Po/w (SILICOS-IT)?

SILICOS-IT: Hybrid fragmental/topological method calculated by
FILTER-IT program, version 1.0.2, courtesy of SILICOS-IT, http://www.silicos-it.com

1.25
Consensus Log Po/w?

Consensus Log Po/w: Average of all five predictions

1.05

Water Solubility

Log S (ESOL):?

ESOL: Topological method implemented from
Delaney JS. 2004 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

-0.3
Solubility 79.9 mg/ml ; 0.499 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Very soluble
Log S (Ali)?

Ali: Topological method implemented from
Ali J. et al. 2012 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

-0.65
Solubility 36.3 mg/ml ; 0.226 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Very soluble
Log S (SILICOS-IT)?

SILICOS-IT: Fragmental method calculated by
FILTER-IT program, version 1.0.2, courtesy of SILICOS-IT, http://www.silicos-it.com

-1.5
Solubility 5.05 mg/ml ; 0.0316 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Soluble

Pharmacokinetics

GI absorption?

Gatrointestinal absorption: according to the white of the BOILED-Egg

 High
BBB permeant?

BBB permeation: according to the yolk of the BOILED-Egg

 Yes
P-gp substrate?

P-glycoprotein substrate: SVM model built on 1033 molecules (training set)
and tested on 415 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.72 / AUC=0.77
External: ACC=0.88 / AUC=0.94

 No
CYP1A2 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 1A2 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9145 molecules (training set)
and tested on 3000 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.83 / AUC=0.90
External: ACC=0.84 / AUC=0.91

 No
CYP2C19 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2C19 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9272 molecules (training set)
and tested on 3000 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.80 / AUC=0.86
External: ACC=0.80 / AUC=0.87

 No
CYP2C9 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2C9 inhibitor: SVM model built on 5940 molecules (training set)
and tested on 2075 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.78 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.71 / AUC=0.81

 No
CYP2D6 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2D6 inhibitor: SVM model built on 3664 molecules (training set)
and tested on 1068 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.79 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.81 / AUC=0.87

 No
CYP3A4 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor: SVM model built on 7518 molecules (training set)
and tested on 2579 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.77 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.78 / AUC=0.86

 No
Log Kp (skin permeation)?

Skin permeation: QSPR model implemented from
Potts RO and Guy RH. 1992 Pharm. Res.

-7.36 cm/s

Druglikeness

Lipinski?

Lipinski (Pfizer) filter: implemented from
Lipinski CA. et al. 2001 Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.
MW ≤ 500
MLOGP ≤ 4.15
N or O ≤ 10
NH or OH ≤ 5

 0.0
Ghose?

Ghose filter: implemented from
Ghose AK. et al. 1999 J. Comb. Chem.
160 ≤ MW ≤ 480
-0.4 ≤ WLOGP ≤ 5.6
40 ≤ MR ≤ 130
20 ≤ atoms ≤ 70

 None
Veber?

Veber (GSK) filter: implemented from
Veber DF. et al. 2002 J. Med. Chem.
Rotatable bonds ≤ 10
TPSA ≤ 140

 0.0
Egan?

Egan (Pharmacia) filter: implemented from
Egan WJ. et al. 2000 J. Med. Chem.
WLOGP ≤ 5.88
TPSA ≤ 131.6

 0.0
Muegge?

Muegge (Bayer) filter: implemented from
Muegge I. et al. 2001 J. Med. Chem.
200 ≤ MW ≤ 600
-2 ≤ XLOGP ≤ 5
TPSA ≤ 150
Num. rings ≤ 7
Num. carbon > 4
Num. heteroatoms > 1
Num. rotatable bonds ≤ 15
H-bond acc. ≤ 10
H-bond don. ≤ 5

 1.0
Bioavailability Score?

Abbott Bioavailability Score: Probability of F > 10% in rat
implemented from
Martin YC. 2005 J. Med. Chem.

0.56

Medicinal Chemistry

PAINS?

Pan Assay Interference Structures: implemented from
Baell JB. & Holloway GA. 2010 J. Med. Chem.

0.0 alert
Brenk?

Structural Alert: implemented from
Brenk R. et al. 2008 ChemMedChem

0.0 alert: heavy_metal
Leadlikeness?

Leadlikeness: implemented from
Teague SJ. 1999 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
250 ≤ MW ≤ 350
XLOGP ≤ 3.5
Num. rotatable bonds ≤ 7

 No; 1 violation:MW<1.0
Synthetic accessibility?

Synthetic accessibility score: from 1 (very easy) to 10 (very difficult)
based on 1024 fragmental contributions (FP2) modulated by size and complexity penaties,
trained on 12'782'590 molecules and tested on 40 external molecules (r2 = 0.94)

 1.5
 

Related Products

Historical Records

Technical Information

Categories

Related Functional Groups of
[ 764-89-6 ]

Aliphatic Chain Hydrocarbons

Chemical Structure| 111-16-0

A110325 [111-16-0]

Heptanedioic acid

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 505-95-3

A111111 [505-95-3]

12-Hydroxydodecanoic acid

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 1679-53-4

A114969 [1679-53-4]

10-Hydroxydecanoic acid

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 2424-92-2

A123107 [2424-92-2]

Icosanedioic acid

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 57-11-4

A497654 [57-11-4]

Octadecanoic acid

Similarity: 1.00

Alcohols

Chemical Structure| 505-95-3

A111111 [505-95-3]

12-Hydroxydodecanoic acid

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 1679-53-4

A114969 [1679-53-4]

10-Hydroxydecanoic acid

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 3788-56-5

A157334 [3788-56-5]

9-Hydroxynonanoic acid

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 17278-74-9

A209054 [17278-74-9]

14-Hydroxytetradecanoic acid

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 13392-69-3

A227900 [13392-69-3]

5-Hydroxypentanoic acid

Similarity: 1.00

Carboxylic Acids

Chemical Structure| 111-16-0

A110325 [111-16-0]

Heptanedioic acid

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 505-95-3

A111111 [505-95-3]

12-Hydroxydodecanoic acid

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 1679-53-4

A114969 [1679-53-4]

10-Hydroxydecanoic acid

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 2424-92-2

A123107 [2424-92-2]

Icosanedioic acid

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 638-53-9

A597584 [638-53-9]

Tridecanoic acid

Similarity: 1.00